National Disability Coalition (Winter 2015)

I don't understand the question

As the parent of a young adult with autism who just began receiving SSI, I was eager to participate in this discussion, but I have no idea what the question is asking. "Identify individuals with medical improvement as the earliest opportunity"? I don't know what that means. I work in the disability field and asked a number of colleagues if they understood what was being asked. Only one of them even offered a suggestion ...more »

Submitted by

Voting

1 vote
Active

National Disability Coalition (Winter 2015)

Autism for adults/adult disabled children

I think people/adult disabled children with autism should not have to be redetermined over and over. If it was proven as a child and then again at 18. That should be enough proof for life. Autism is in the brain, the brain does not change. No one has ever stopped being autistic. As the autistic person ages, the disability does not improve. They require more care and more assistance as they age. I think if they have ...more »

Submitted by (@morentin1326)

Voting

1 vote
Active

National Disability Coalition (Winter 2015)

Dedicated Accounts

I understand that when a disabled child is awarded a large amount (6mo.+) it must go into a dedicated account. That is only to be used for medical or educational. And you must get permission from SSA before the funds are used and must submit proof of purchase. I get that. But it is not fair to still force the same rules for the dedicated account, once the child become 18 and is deemed an adult disabled child. The SSA.gov ...more »

Submitted by (@morentin1326)

Voting

1 vote
Active

National Disability Coalition (Winter 2015)

Determining medical improvement

In my work for the Vermont Disability Determination Services (DDS) and for National Council of Disability Determination Directors (NCDDD), I have heard various ideas related to the question of medical improvement and continuing disability review (CDR) processing. I will describe some of these ideas below for the purposes of this discussion. Please note that neither NCDDD nor the Vermont DDS has taken an official position ...more »

Submitted by (@trudy.lyonhart)

Voting

0 votes
Active

National Disability Coalition (Winter 2015)

The Medical Improvement Review Standard Should Not Be Changed

We submit these comments as Co-Chairs of the Consortium for Citizens with Disabilities Social Security Task Force. The Consortium for Citizens with Disabilities (CCD) is a coalition of national organizations working together to advocate for national public policy that ensures the self-determination, independence, empowerment, integration, and inclusion of the 57 million children and adults with disabilities in all aspects ...more »

Submitted by

Voting

1 vote
Active

National Disability Forum

Question 4

Assuming limited funding, what services are considered the most beneficial for youth? Should SSA directly provide these services (e.g., WIPAs and ENs), or should they be provided by traditional service-providers and agencies (e.g., VR, DOL, ED, HHS, state & local, etc.)?

Submitted by

Voting

0 votes
Active